A Pathetic Update

This fellow is simply repeating nonsense, now it is pathetic.

Blog: “God is not a thing not a concept”. 

If god is not a thing, god is nothing. This great defender of religion does not know that ‘not a thing’ means nothing. May be that is why he is not defining ‘thing’. Read carefully fellow, not a thing means 'nothing', 'emptiness', 'nonexistence'. 

“One individual (human being) is not a concept not a thing.human being is a person. Human person can be male or female. But both are in the category of person.” 

Great, now he is saying that humans are nothing. 

All humans belong to the category of Homo sapiens, all Homo sapiens belong to the category of animals, all animals belong to the category of living things.

All buildings, crystals, stars and planets belong to the category of non-living (inanimate) things.

All living things and nonliving things belong to the category of “things/objects”. Thing is a synonym for object. They all have one property; they all have three dimensional shape that separate themselves from their surroundings and they all have a location. They all exist, all objects exist, in fact only objects exist.

“Human person is made up of matter. 

But human person can think , have a free will and can make choices. . He Can't  be fully controlled by external factors. So he is not matter alone.” 

He is coming with new terms that he does not understand. May be he is hoping that because he doesn’t understand nobody else will. If he thinks humans are not matter alone, it is his job to explain what else is there. He can’t simply say because I am blah,blah…. I am not matter alone.

“Matter

Change with time”

First define matter, so that we will know what you are speaking about.

“God as a person

Exist Exist -always present(same yesterday,today and tomorrow).  

(Not change with time.)

Not made up of matter

God made matter.” 

Persons are made of matter, they cannot be made of 'nothing’. If god is a person he has no choice but to be made of matter. If he claims that his god is not made of matter, then he is claiming that his god is nothing. If god is nothing, then how did nothing made matter?

And nothing penetrates his thick skull. He was informed that ‘present’ means exist and his definition always present means always exist. He was told that exist and eternal are NOT synonyms. Yet he is repeating the same nonsense. Now this fellow is saying exist also means ‘not change with time’. He doesn't understand that definition restrict meaning. He is stating that exist is a synonym of stale or stagnant or calcified,  which is an obvious skulduggery. This fellow either doesn’t understand or is using subterfuge when he says that all the three terms have the same meaning. Add to that an unchanging god cannot make matter, for if he does, he changes and by his definition he ceases to be god.

"God made matter", but you have not told us about matter fellow. Matter is another synonym of object. What is the rational behind the great assertion? How did nothing, 'emptiness', made things? Nothing doesn't take part in any action, can't he see the obvious ontological contradiction? If god is a thing, he has to admit that matter doesn't need creation. His chicanery will be exposed, hence this word juggling. 
If your god is not a (no) thing, it's ok fellow,  but then don't say nothing made matter, you will only be making a fool of yourself. 

So fellow, if you are not a brain dead looser or a charlatan, define ‘exist’ unambiguously. If you want to use ‘present’, define that. Also define ‘thing’.

"present(same yesterday,today and tomorrow)"

Present doesn't mean same as yesterday,  today and tomorrow, present means exist. If you think differently define 'present'.

“Some people can't distinguish between person and an impersonal thing. They call  their father it (because they think their father is matter). Ignorance and arrogance will lead them to foolishness.”

An emotional ploy, the last refuge of the scoundrel! This worthless 'soul' does not know what ‘thing’ means, he does not even dare to properly define his terms. He confuses his lay talk with literal discussion. Because people say humans are animals and rats are animals, does he mean that people can't differentiate between rats and humans? Does he find it difficult to distinguish between his mother and a worm because both are living things. Is he claiming that his mother is a living nothing not knowing that living is what a group of things called 'organisms' do?

May be he thinks his father is not an animal. He might be thinking that his father is god or some other concept, for he says his father is nothing. All kings and bastards claim that. Poor fellow, may be really doesn’t know his father and might be thinking that he is divine birth. It is only fortunate that he is of low intelligence that he doesn't understand the meanings of most words.
Or maybe he is a trickster hoping to use this as a red herring.  He might be hoping that the discussion will turn away from his contradictions and tomfoolery. 

May be he is a retard or has birth asphyxia and his mommy is trying to train him, réhabilitate him, that is why all this nonsense.  Then I should not criticize him. I will leave him alone, let him continue with his childish ramblings, after all, one should show pity.